Below I discuss my key takeaways, themes, and ideas drawn from the book.
<aside> đź“Ś In an attempt to defend the goodness of God, many interpreters have gone beyond what the biblical text actually says regarding the reason for the Canaanite conquest. The Bible does not say the Canaanites deserved to be driven out of the land because of their sin, wickedness, or uncleanness. Rather, it was a matter of covenant faithfulness and community preservation. Our inaccurate assertions are a result of a misunderstanding of what the Bible is, mistranslating what the Hebrew says, and ignoring the ANE context.
</aside>
<aside> ⚔️ The Bible is a record of God's actions that we are supposed to understand, not a compilation of rules that we are supposed to obey (20).
</aside>
<aside> ⚔️ The Bible exists to tell us what God is doing, and it describes what God is doing in terms of the language, logic, and values of the culture to which it was originally written (23).
</aside>
When we claim the Canaanites were wicked and deserved their destruction we are going beyond what the Biblical text says; usurping the authority of the Bible to say what we want it to say. To respect the authority of the Bible, we should look at what the text actually says (or doesn’t say) about the Canaanites and make our conclusion based on the text. Below are some key points Walton establishes before getting into detailed arguments.
<aside> ⚔️ Importantly, the Bible gives only two reasons for the conquest:
</aside>